May 11, 2016 at 11:04 am Tenita Reid Reply The Anatomy of Fear May 11, 2016 at 10:50 am Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Reply Tenita Reid Free webinar for job seekers on best interview answers, hosted by Goodwill June 11 Pastor Hezekiah Bradford returned to a familiar topic during the public comments portion of The Apopka City Council meeting on Wednesday – Single Member Districts. And as thoroughly as that topic was addressed during the election cycle, and in a five-part series in The Apopka Voice, Mayor Joe Kilsheimer covered new ground during his back-and-forth with Bradford. He saw his request for a Single Member District discussion, and raised him a Charter Review.“We had a discussion,” said Kilsheimer. “The community had a discussion during the campaign. Not one of the candidates favored entertaining this discussion.”Commissioner Doug Bankson made this statement to The Apopka Voice about Single Member Districts during the campaign:“I support at-large representation for some of the same reasons others are for single member districts, and that’s to have fair representation and support at the elected level,” he said. “The difference is that size and distance effect how you can directly influence decision makers (example: national versus local have different dynamics due to proximity.) A smaller citizenry can go directly to all commissioners and persuade several votes, while single member districts may secure one, but eliminate others to fight for you over their own constituents. Therefore you can win the battle but lose the war. Orlando is five times larger than Apopka, and in that incident I would be for single member districts, but due to our size and ability to directly reach more elected officials, I would at this time support at-large representation.”Commissioner Kyle Becker made this statement to The Apopka Voice during the campaign:“I currently support the structure of at-large seats as the basis of our City’s Council. The beauty of our election process is that any Apopka resident is able to step up and say ‘I represent the interests of Apopka’ without regard to what part of Apopka that candidate may be from. Are there unique challenges in the South Apopka area? There certainly are, and I am running because there are issues across Apopka as a whole that need to be addressed as well. As Commissioner, I will invest all time necessary to weigh impacts and interests from each portion of our city when making Council decisions.”Kilsheimer continued.“A charter is in place. We had a charter review in 2013. I am fully prepared to have a full and complete charter discussion from A-Z. Every topic needs to be on the agenda. I am firmly persuaded that the charter review we had a few years ago did not inspire confidence from the public.”Bradford remained focused on the idea of getting the Single Member District initiative on the agenda.“I want to see someone we can hold accountable. I want to make sure nobody is left behind. We want someone we know can come back to us on the southside and tell us what they have accomplished.”Kilsheimer remained staunch in his belief that a charter review must cover all issues, not specific to one issue, and that all commissioners and himself can be held accountable for all of Apopka.“We have two new energetic commissioners, and myself who will go virtually anywhere we are asked and address any issue you want addressed. And I see Commissioner (Diane) Velazquez all around town. But I’m just going to say a charter review should be done comprehensively, not on a one-off basis.”In November of 2013, and concluding in early June of 2014, the Apopka City Charter Review Committee met to discuss three issues – term limits, adding two commissioners to the City Council, and single member districts. May 11, 2016 at 10:38 am LEAVE A REPLY Cancel reply TAGSApopka City CouncilCharter ReviewSingle Member Districts Previous articleWhat Does the Orange County Sign Ordinance Allow?Next articleApopka High Grad KJ Dillon signs with Texans Denise Connell RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR What is the number one thing that keeps a lot of citizens from running for elected office? The cash required to file to run. I am talking about not only city elections, but all the various elections. Most of the other elections allow for petition signatures in lieu of cash. Orange County elections, and state seats, allow for a certain amount of signatures collected, and they can run. While it is not easy to acquire the needed signatures, it is allowed, if the voter’s signatures check out correctly, and everything is on the up and up. I heard it costs about $ 7,000 dollars to run for school board in Orange County, and I was told by another candidate I spoke with, about $ 10,000 dollars to run for Congress. I don’t know if these amounts or correct or not, just what I was told. Who has that kind of money to toss around, except Rick Scott, of course? Reply Tenita Reid Change the charter to allow petition signatures to run for city council in lieu of cash. Let’s see how far that will go at the next charter review! LOL !!! Tenita Reid Reply I looked up the salary of the Orange County School Board members, and I was surprised that certain county’s members in Florida earn way more, than in other counties in Florida. Palm Beach, Orange, Miami-Dade, and some others earn the top salaries, while some other counties that are small, or less dense, earn not half, but closer to half, than those in our county. Doesn’t seem fair. I think the state should pay equally across all the counties in Florida, for the school board elected members. That is how I see it. Please enter your comment! 4 COMMENTS May 7, 2016 at 12:03 am Please enter your name here Support conservation and fish with NEW Florida specialty license plate It appears someone gave me incorrect info about the cost to run for Orange County School Board. If the salary is 42, 000 dollars+ it would be about 1700 dollars, give or take to run, at about 4 percent. Don’t worry people, you couldn’t pay me enough to run for that job!!!! Maybe I didn’t hear the amount correctly, that someone told me. Who knows. Anyway, they can run by petition method. The bigger and more important the seats, the more the common man or woman can’t run because of the cash needed for the filing fees, and that is un-American and a shame. You have entered an incorrect email address! Please enter your email address here Share on Facebook Tweet on Twitter
Would you like to read more?Register for free to finish this article.Sign up now for the following benefits:Four FREE articles of your choice per monthBreaking news, comment and analysis from industry experts as it happensChoose from our portfolio of email newsletters To access this article REGISTER NOWWould you like print copies, app and digital replica access too? SUBSCRIBE for as little as £5 per week.